Leaderboard

Yes, actually. I learn almost all the music I know by listening, but there are certain things that are difficult to distinguish just by listening, particularly parts played by doubled or sometimes tripled instruments. Sometimes I will listen to a piece and attempt to transcribe it by ear, but this does result in the problem of not being able to tell if I have listened and transcribed correctly since I cannot see what the actual score looks like, nor hear an orchestra play my version to see if they match up. Long story short, there's no way to tell for sure if I am actually getting the whole picture just by listening.

Also don't forget Brahms!! His Hungarian Dances are very rich orchestral works and also short ones. Very good to be analyzed and read!

I know the compsers you've mentioned. You really don't need their scores. You can learn them by ear by listening to the films. If you have a decent synth that sounds like strings and brass, etc. you can play along with the film and learn it. If you cannot do this, I'm not sure that a score will help you. What I mean is, learning by listening is key. For example, take John Williams score for the film "Accidental Tourst." It's mostly piano. It's simple. But is it? The actual music is much more complex than the eventual orchestration. But can you HEAR it? The music, I mean?

And Tchaikovsky.