All Activity

No I was actually looking at 170-173. It doesn't look diatonic there because of the recurring A natural. Is this E flat Lydian Dominant?

Yes, in the UK we always use concert pitch for the conductor's score. I let MuseScore handle the transposing instrument part scores; but always check them for mistakes.

Guess I am basically a Neoclassical composer, with some Romanticism no stronger than Brahms, Mendelssohn, or Rachmaninoff. Strange how the Baroque slips in; can't explain it myself!

Hey @Mooravioli! What an underwhelming piece to have as the first ensemble piece that you've had performed and recorded! I feel like your style is hard to get into, but it definitely gains from repeated listenings. The listener gains more and more affinity for this piece upon repeated listenings I mean. It's very esoteric to get into though. But I love your use of flutter-tongue and slap-tongue on the saxophone! Great use of extended techniques. Though I think that the music could be more unified and self-similar. I don't find myself whistling or humming a tune after listening to this piece. Besides just having cool techniques and unusual chords and progressions I think it's also important to give the listener a long-leading melodic line and a clear theme. But that might just be my opinion, and I'm a very thematic composer. You do you, of course. Thanks for sharing!

Hello again @HoYin Cheung! First, I have to say that I love this piece! I've played it in recital back in my university days. I also love the idea of arranging this for a solo Violin - Piano duet! It will definitely make for some very musically intimate moments between you and your g/f that only this kind of music can create! I do have a minor critique of your arrangement however - I feel like the Violin and Piano should start together, doubling the main melody at the same time. I think it sounds like something is missing when the piano starts alone, without the Violin and it's also too much like the original. I think you should endeavor to make your arrangement different from the original from the very beginning, to make potential listeners aware that this is an arranged version from the very beginning. That's my humble opinion. Every other part of the arrangement is great! Thanks for sharing!

very nice, I look forward to it (always good to introduce simplicity into the mix too) and thanks for giving me a like on my old post!

Hey @Mooravioli! Thanks for your review! Stay tuned for that in a future movement! I've already composed a variation which does this, I just haven'y integrated it into a finished movement yet. I feel like it wouldn't be in the spirit of the original themes by Nobuo Uematsu to use microtones since they didn't use microtones. Although I definitely plan on writing plenty of my own microtonal VGM music in the future. Thanks again for your review!

Sounds awesome! Really like how all the instruments sound together. The timing of the notes gives a feeling of slipping and unpredictability. I imagine this would fit in a game where you need to move carefully to make you feel unstable. Or simply a horror game full of surprises.

Hello Peter, A masterful work which integrates many unique and lovely textures, as well as colorful dissonances. I especially liked the string quartet variation, which I thought was quite original of you to include. Although the piece remains in e minor for much of its duration(apart from the later variations), I feel there are so many distinguishing features in the compositional process that shift the focus away from modulation, and I must say that this is not easy to do(as a composer who relies too much on modulation). With this, you are building a really interesting, modal harmonic language. I also admire the way you've woven the different themes together to create a rich, dense texture. I do think it would be a nice contrast if we could have a clear melodic line/homophonic idea in order to introduce a specific theme. Hey.. its just an idea. But I am also surprised you're not using microtones in this piece because to me, its probably a part of your style at this point. 🥴

Dear all, After all recent completion of my Symphony No.1 - Movement II, I finally got some time to work on some tiny projects. Phew. This time I would like to present my arrangement for Johannes Brahm's Intermezzo. The original work by Johanne Brahms is written for piano solo. It is definitely perfect and is one of my (and my gf's) favourite classical works. My gf and I want to plat it in arrangement for violin-piano duet, but the available scores online, in my humble opinion, does not build enough interaction between the violin and piano. Therefore, I decided to make my own arrangement for this piece. Minimal modification was made in terms of additional elements/ chord changes. Main features in this version includes the further emphasis of the "longing" motive ("C-B-D") and distribute the melodic part more evenly between the instruments. I also added some harmonics for violin to bring in some extra variety of texture for the piece. Hope it sounds well. Please feel free to share your thoughts on this arrangement. Thank you! Best, HoYin

I believe you're referring to beat 3? I didn't want to spell the Eb major chord as a D# major chord (on account of having to spell the G as an Fx and also because there occur both F#'s as well as G's in the voice leading which are still best understood in the key of E minor). The chord on beat 3 is actually an F# major chord spelled with a Bb instead of an A# (and again, this is done because of voice leading since the Bb leads to an A in the following harmony of B7 with a C# in the bass). You gotta consider that the whole chromatic system is imperfect and often, compromises must be made for the sake of readability and voice leading. Also often, organizing the given pitches into a heptatonic scale with no repeated notes as best one can takes precedence over spelling passing chords on weak beats correctly. Are you referring to the Db major section in measure 258? Db major has 5 flats while C# major has 7 sharps so that was just a practicality and familiarity thing. Some key signatures are preferable to others for practical reasons and are used way more often because of that. That to me justified switching to a flat key even though the tonal center of C# is not that foreign to a piece in E minor, being the relative minor of E major. Yes, that is annoying for sure. Even more so for harp which sometimes needs everything respelled a certain way according to the position of its pedals. But correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to use scores in concert pitch for your music? That's one way to avoid the trouble in the score, but if you ever need to print out parts you'd still need to transpose it to the correct enharmonic key. Unless you're working with an instrumentalist who is expected to be able to transpose such as Trumpet or French Horn. Thanks for your comments!

Could be for a game or a movie idk. maybe this fits more in a movie. This is in piano but I hope you can imagine it as an orchestral cinematic piece like I do. Just not really experienced in arranging orchestral intruments. Maybe Ill do it in the future. I think this is considered a scottish or irish style correct me if i'm wrong. Would love to hear your thoughts. https://on.soundcloud.com/8rUORnL2KJFhPd1P1h The mistakes in the start are intentional.

Thank so much for the warm, kind review.

I notice some interesting enharmonic spelling choices. E.g. Bar 32, you've got a Bb minor triad between the celli and violas, spelled with a C# instead of a Db. Then in some places you have lots of flats, and I think you're changing mode here, rather than moving to a different diatonic key? Wondered if it was difficult to choose which spelling to use? Sometimes when my music gets very chromatic, I find I need different spelling in the transposing instruments, which is an added complication! Seems to apply especially to Bb instruments, like clarinet and trumpet.

Very nice work, sounds huge 🙂 Which soundbank(s) do you use ?

Hi all 🙂 On vacation doing little treks in the eastern Vosges mountains in France, I profited by my late afternoon free times to give a first try at a woodwind quartet. Here's the result study. I merely structured it as A B ... A B 🙂 and there are one or two harmonic attempts in it. Regards

Really enjoyed your piece, @Kvothe Nice melodies, expressiveness, and a story telling writing ; that's what I like in music 👍 Regards

Not bad 🙂 Indeed there's a dark, melancholic mood surging out of it.

Hi Peter, I took it down because the piece had some direct quotation, and I was worried about copyright issues. I'm actually still working on it, to try and eliminate any recognisable quotation from the original work. Think I'm almost there. If I manage it, will repost. I've also made an orchestration of this work, that I can hopefully post with it.

That sounds like a jazz piece with complex chord choices before 03:45 with a tons of synchropation. I actually enjoy it - fresh and energetic Curious what software and prompt/ constraint used to produce this music with AI? That was an abrupt stop though. lol

So, I finally convinced AI to perform serial music. If you know, AI is very stubborn in creating everything tonal and consonant. It's good at that, but you can modify midi to be strict and work with AI to create an atonal sound. I like the idea of modern fugues to create a sound of undulating persistence. The sound is deliberate. Though, this fugue is more of a Passaglia, it's within reach. fractal-fugue (46).mid

Ok, so to preface, I am in a church choir for a TLM, (and I'm also in the Schola Cantorum so I'm trained to sing the Gregorian chants at Mass, just to brag a little 😏.) Anyway, I was anticipating more traditional style Latin motets, and I'ma be honest with you, the Novus Ordo style with the piano and such makes me really quite uncomfortable, but I said I'd give you some feedback, so I'll try my best. Just beware, I'll probably give very old-fashioned advice with a large bias for Latin Mass aesthetics, so just take what you think is applicable. The Assumption: The voice leading on the SATB part is fine, so no criticism there. I do find the bass part really high though (I am bass myself.) At moderate or louder dynamics like this, it will sound strained, even with higher bass singers. The piano part and flute part I think just add mud and uncomfortable dissonances. The piano part isn't even well written, just looking at it as a pianist myself. Especially since these are supposed to be motets, I'd nix the instrumental parts entirely, except maybe an optional organ reduction. Finally, the engraving is just really... unproffesional. First of all, the tenor should be in treble clef, unless it's a reduced score. I can't imagine trying to read all those ledger lines! The lyric syllables are divided incorrectly, which made it very awkward to read. Here's a guide: Syllable Rules: Divide Into Syllables, and here are all the syllables of this first motet divided properly: Ma-ry is as-sumed in-to heav-en, Moth-er from Earth, now Moth-er of all! Look at the an-gels gaz-ing up-on her, prais-ing our God for the wom-an He made! Al-le-lu-ia, Hail our Queen, Mar-y! Moth-er you passed through the gates, but you're nev-er too far a-way. Will you show us you're near? Hear our prayer! etc. Other engraving nitpicks, page should be portrait not landscape, the scaling should be larger, it's standard and preferable to include the voice range and instrument names, dynamics in vocal music fit better above the staff, and we need a square bracket! I could probably find even more nitpicky stuff if I looked, but this is a good start. Come Holy Spirit: The plain song bit makes this a little more tolerable, but a suspended cymbal in liturgical music?? 😭 I digress. The voice leading here is also fine.And I echo the criticisms of pateceramics, competent choirs will stagger long held notes, regardless of instruction in the score. And the part about the Gregorian chant being off meter. If you do this, please write it unmetered or with partial barlines like in actual chant notation on just that staff, and in each of the other voices just have one whole note under the entire chant solo. If that doesn't make sense, I can sketch up an example for you, but that should be clear. This is also an engraving problem btw, so as you improve your engraving skills, you'll learn how to engrave less commonplace moments like this. What I explained is just what I would do, but there are certainly other ways to handle it. Both these motets, but especially this one, have the issue of feeling stagnant to me. Like they sit in the same I-IV-V range of the tonic key and really don't move anywhere else. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it makes for music that can sound uninspired and unoriginal. Sorry if this all is too harsh, I promise it's in good faith and I hope you are able to take this criticism to heart and let it help you improve as a composer. God bless, my friend.

Hi again @Alex Weidmann! I decided to find this work after your review of my FFVI work. I would review it if I could listen to it again but there doesn't seem to be any sound file or link to YT video? Where is the music?