James H. Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Danny is right, it's "close." It's still a bit complicated, for instance, it seems like there are way too much tabs. But he mentioned something I noticed subconsciously - the RH website IS too narrow. Could it use more page width? This might be a one liner in the CSS for the developers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James H. Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Actually, I agree. Make sure everything works on the latest IE, don't worry so much about 6, we're on 8 now. It's more trouble than it's worth when you can add a "best viewed in IE # or later, opera, ff, chrome, whatever else" Or perhaps a warning up top that only shows up when the page is loaded with an earlier version of IE, "best viewed .... " or "page requires IE # or later" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chopin Posted December 29, 2009 Author Share Posted December 29, 2009 How does everyone like the new default design "YC Classic"? Feedback would be appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrcramer Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 I like to use the Classic for the forum. Its more practical, since I am used to it. The tradeoff is that it seems like I'm working on two sites. RH and YC (forum) I use the forum (not RH) to browse the pieces. Monitor the new ones, look for reactions. Too bad the RH layout is not as easy to oversee... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.