Leaderboard

Why do trolls mess up every topic opened here? Is this such a fetish? :longface:

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new -Albert Einstein

1) All of them: 2) None of them: 3) A deceptive cadence isn't actually a cadence (in the same way a false recapitulation isn't actually a recapitulation), and establishes nothing, though it can use the second chord as a pivot: 1) The deceptive cadence, 'G7 – F6/3', isn't analysed as 'II7 – I' in F, it's 'V7 – VI6–' in C. The second chord, by the way, isn't said to be functioning as a first inversion subdominant; it is a submediant with a suspended or substituted tone—what you call it depends on how it resolves—since it's functioning as a tonic substitute, and not a predominant harmony; this sort of thing can happen whenever the bass expresses the function strongly, and the fifth above isn't essential to conveying this function; in this case, the scale degree 5 to scale degree 6 move in the bass expressing a deceptive cadence. 2) The progression modulates through the Am region, after the first G major chord, to Em (the progression of the first three chords is on a C–G spectrum, since they're contrapuntal). If you're calling 'Dm6/3 - E - Am6/3' a deceptive cadence because the Am isn't in root position, it isn't the same as the deceptive cadence in no. 1 (usually, people call the one in no. 2 an evaded cadence, instead).

Another site: http://www.music.indiana.edu/department/composition/isfee/

My, my, aren't we the party pooper? :cool:

Emotionology, eh? Emotionology? Really?

Overlooking intricacies the Concepts despite contributing the cogent conceptualization of Musiotics your ideas are. I would say deriving Parallels which in itself, allowing despoiliation per se, (the Infinite within Cosmos and the Infinitesimal) disallowing Universal. It inanity is the music; Profane within compounded cannot be compared to the like and of Baroque music, the Classical neo-Romanticism. The context Beneath which of viewpoints rhombus Divine and not misconstruing integral Shifts, bijective and non-local. Relativism is blurred, "dividing by itself" another Which all Pretentiousness can muster. Therefore, Marzique, I postulate that you are wrong. --Ian Constaxulaxium Pazuria

Hey Marzique - I appreciate the time you took to write this post! Unfortunately, you have admitted that nobody will understand it. Therefore, I do not see the point of it existing here. I also would urge for you to schedule an appointment with a doctor because you seem to be a little delusional about your understanding of music.

My thought processess are very sophisticated & seemingly impractical to such a degree that some would consider unintelligible. :hmmm: