Interesting. I have mixed thoughts about this.
Music is rammed down my/our throat(s) so often that it’s become an annoyance in supermarkets; TV ads and documentaries, lifts, presumably to “enhance our experience” of what’s behind it. Film music annoys me. Worse, being in a telephone queue. I’m sure this so-called music is designed to aggravate people in the hope they’ll hang up.
But in music designed to be listened to I find meaning in its sensuality rather than emotion (although a good ‘major key’ build up and climax can be exhilarating). I have to close my eyes and be drawn in to the mood. I want imagery, however surreal – anything from the abstract to the quasi-realistic; subtle sensations that span out as imagery of a kind. Hence my faves include the likes of early Sculthorpe, Delius, Debussy, Lutyens, Villa-Lobos et sim.
I suppose it doesn’t help suffering synaesthesia which is a cross-modal neural problem. I don’t know if I had it naturally or through neural plasticity from ‘ingesting’ certain substances when a little younger. As I understand it now, synaesthesia is something that can be cultivated if one wants it.
I rarely find emotional meaning in music which through European cultural tradition usually implies ‘key’ and the means to exploit concordant harmony. The semiotics are well established. I listen to music in keys, sure, but for me there’s no need to add to it as a composer. It’s more about being a filter to atmosphere, to impression (in which moments of tonal centre can happen but the evanescence, the flow seem more dominant in the necessarily loose structure. Yes, music can evoke emotion but I can’t easily equate that with meaning.
Once more the forum has provoked me to think about this because I’m never sure why I compose. It can be exciting...it can be frustrating!