At the moment for the suits at record companies and TV editors LOL
But honestly, I'm different from most people regarding this, and kinda always have been. I don't try to do the "modest" thing.
I compose music to be listened to. I honestly just don't really see the point in composing, otherwise. In composing "for myself" I've always composed because there is a piece of music in my mind that I want to hear, and I haven't found anyone else composing. That's not to say it's a terribly-original idea (I hardly care about being super different tbh) but it's presented in a way I want to hear and no one else is doing, or at least I can't be bothered to dig that long to find it, so I'll just do it on my own because that is faster. So I compose for myself from the perspective of a music appreciator rather than a composer.
I hear these composers who say "Oh I don't listen to my stuff once I'm done with it." and I'm just like "WTF is even the point then if you're not going to enjoy your own work?"
But also, and (bizarrely) more controversially, I want to try and contribute to not just culture, but a high-culture that promotes beauty and excellence. I care about the craft of composition, and want to keep the traditions that our ancestors established alive; ideas that worked to create their timeless pieces that have inspired people across cultures for generations in the hope that maybe one day I'll be able to achieve the same.
That necessarily involves the approval of other people, and despite the tortured wishes of many today, "good and bad" or "beautiful and ugly" are much more universally-recognized than some would have us believe. So whether or not you're creating something that will really resonate with people really isn't a matter of chance. When you observe what the consensus around your work is, the attention it is getting or not getting; it lets you know how well you're progressing. If tons of people are saying "You suck", and you care about bringing joy to people instead of misery and aural obscenity, it will force you to try harder and to learn more about the craft.
Lastly, it's really great when you make something that does bring joy to people. Over the years, I've been fortunate enough to have received comments and messages from total strangers saying they like my work, it uplifted them somehow, and it inspires them in their own.
That's what it's all about.
Depends on the "others" in question
Depends if it's a lay person or another musician.
There are a lot of musicians on the internet who can blow it out their @$$ tbh
One of the things that keeps me coming back to YC is this is one of the few places on the web where the feedback and responses you get from people is generally coming from people who know what they're talking about, and do make valid points if they have something negative to say.
It's not like that elsewhere, though. I actually read one of Christopher Siu's daily spam emails he sends me recently that talked about how on forums, there are usually all these arrogant people who provide trash feedback, and that is often the case by my experience in decades of music forums and the like.
Usually, there is one or two guys who give the majority of feedback, and they always have very strong negative opinions and telling you what to do, but they themselves are actually of abysmally-low ability. They've never written a coherent melody in their lives, but are quite certain there's much wrong with yours.
Thankfully that's not happening here; Henry gives feedback on just about every piece, but Henry actually knows what he's doing and so it's worth listening to him.