Leaderboard

You're forgetting the Coordinate Emotionality Matrix whereby deviation can contribute its factor with layers of infinite density which result in infrastructures of high levels of complexity which deviate from the default coordinate modulatives thereby creating a multitude of values with respect to the degree of variation present. I suggest you refine and redistribute your 'purity functions' via Boolean organization and/or seek immediate help. Derp.

No, they remind me of this:

Hey! Don't abuse your creativity by painting rainbows everywhere!! :angry:

Figure 1: Happy-Earth Anger-Fire Sad-Water(Tears) Fear-Air(Wind) We owe much to pythagoras & the pythagorians for classical music & music in general would not be what it is today. But the pythagorians not only contributed science like the discovery of intervallics but at times presented analogies that perhaps one could assert were so advanced that logic could not prove them without a doubt nonetheless made some sense that although they could not be proven they also could not be ruled out either. The above figure 1 perhaps in it's purified view falls into a skeptical position regarding more intricate combinations of analogical science, nonetheless in it's purity there is a fundamental lesson to be learned as to the elemental &/or generalistic doctrine. Music seems to present itself as an unphantomable enigma of indivisible proportions when one is attempting to explain it whole, but nonetheless one can draw specific formulas throughout time even to the point of constructing an entire composition without an instrument or mental sound with pure mathematics with a certain degree of manual control almost proving that music is a soundless matrixial logic that listening to music is nothing but an unecessary luxury which we enjoy but not necessary to make what is refered to as music classifiable as the language of emotions per constant coordinate modulatives. Take for instance the illustration above, we know there are far more than four elements but out of the multitude of earthly composition these four are the most outspoken so i decree that the ancients were hitting on a concrete argument partially in a certain matter of very unique universal ambiguity. Figure 1 offers the most purified form of cohesive analogy regardless of the impurities possible, the atypical & complex pollutions or not pure conjuctions & intricate alignments that nonetheless present themselves as normal natural phenomenae. :musicwhistle:

Amen=So be it! :nod:

:horrified: You are saying that sacred parables are more important than esoterics? To the point of elimination thus arbitration? I agree with ethical conditioning as long as there also exists the liberal pursuits of knowledge. I may have misundertood your message :facepalm: , but what i can say is for me intellectualism & morality are one & indivisible as long as they are tempered cohesively thus prematurity can with a safety net be avoided. Thank You! :D

Did it ever occur to you why the authors of the Bible's New Testament used parables to communicate multifaceted observations and postulates about potentially better ways of loving? To avoid the drivel you just wrote which simply says - "I may be right or wrong in my method but only the passing of time will tell." I strongly suggest you read Hemingway and cease the infatuation with Jung's esoteric writings. May you compose ably and with joy Marquez!

When the ghost of Mozart shakes your hand and tells you 'Bravo! Ihr Stück ist würdig durchgeführt werden in einem Konzert!'