i agree, when i don’t care about the outcome so much it happens very fast and usually doesn’t suffer anything for it.
When i care a lot about the outcome it can take a very, very long time.
I think the whole of my process could be boiled down to properly channeling the spirit that’s supposed to be communicated through the music. Even issues of technique are really not that at all; it’s the ability to channel something that accounts for everything, in my view.
Nevertheless I think composing, no matter how intuitive you are, inevitably involves some grunt-work and the solitary, problem-solving or chore-like aspects of composing are not things that i enjoy and make me procrastinate a lot. I would even say that it stops me from being more into composing than i might otherwise be, because for those reasons it is hard.
I don’t know if i deliberately challenge myself but i will say that, despite a lot of my music being very early in style, I think of myself as fundamentally attracted to novelty and very disinterested in mere replication of a style even if that can be a secondary target in some ways.
EDIT: after mulling it over, i think one of my weaknesses is elongating my ideas to fill a satisfying amount of space for the listener. I think that I do ultimately do this but it’s difficult. I definitely find “intellectual “ or technical stuff gets tedious for me and i do have to consciously go about filling enough space when writing a fugue for instance, because i’ll often feel like i would rather move on after making the initial idea clear in the first few passages. i think i’m naturally more drawn to the visceral and decorative elements in music so whipping up the enthusiasm to enlarge fugues gets to be a chore
which reminds me that, just in general, feeling like id rather move on to a new section when writing music is a big compulsion that i have to fight.